Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 15 May 2021 7:04pm
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT COURT CAN ENTERTAIN A WRIT PETITION EVEN IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ALTERNATE REMEDY
542 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Indira Banerjee passed a #Judgment dated 12-05-2021 in the case of Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. And Anr. v. CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited And Anr. {Special Leave Petition (C) NO. 8630 OF 2021} and held that presence…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 8 May 2021 11:49am
SUPREME COURT HOLDS BUYER ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR LAND ACQUISITION
988 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah passed a #Judgment dated 30-04-2021 in the case of Sukhbir v. Ajit Singh {CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2021} and held that that a #buyer is entitled to #compensation along with interest and solatium for land acquisition under the provisions…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 7 May 2021 8:21pm
SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN WEST BENGAL HOUSING INDUSTRY REGULATION ACT, 2017
442 0 0
A Two Judge Bench of the #SupremeCourt has in a recent case of Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) & Anr. vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. Writ Petition (C) No. 116 of 2019 passed a #Judgment dated 04-05-2021 and #struck down the #constitutionalvalidity of the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (#WBHIRA) for being…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 7 May 2021 6:39pm
SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT A CONTRACT HAS TO BE INTERPRETED IN LITERAL TERMS
487 0 0
The Hon’ble Bench of the #SupremeCourt on India in the case of Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) versus E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [CA No. 9273/2019], vide its Judgment dated 03.05.2021 reiterated that a liberal or a narrow approach cannot be adopted to construe a #contractual clause in an #agreement. A contract has to…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:31am
DELHI HIGH COURT SETS ASIDE UNREASONABLE ORDERS PASSED BY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
841 0 0
The #DelhiHighCourt has in a recent case of Ericsson India Global Services Private Limited vs Union of India and Others WP (C) 13249 of 2019, passed a Judgment dated 27-04-2021 and directed the Respondents to consider the #claims of the Petitioners under Service Exports from India Scheme (#SEIS), which were unreasonably rejected by the Respondents.To…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:13am
DELHI HIGH COURT HOLDS THAT TRANSFER OF SHARES IN A LEASEHOLD PROPERTY IS NOT DEEMED TO BE TRANSFER OF ASSETS
830 0 0
The #DelhiHighCourt in the case of Vipul Plastic And Allied Industries Pvt Ltd vs DDA, vide its Judgment dated 26.04.2021 while deciding a conversion of Delhi Development Authority (#DDA) Commercial Property from #leasehold to #freehold held that DDA could not charge unearned increase for transfer of #shares in the company as the said transfer was…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:00am
SUPREME COURT DISMISSES BANKS’ APPLICATIONS FOR RECALL OF DISCLOSURE DIRECTIONS TO RBI
1026 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran passed a Judgment dated 28-04-2021 in the case of Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry & Anr. M.A. No.2342 of 2019 in Transferred Case (Civil) No.91 of 2015 whereby it dismissed an Application filed by miscellaneous #Banks…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:45pm
SUPREME COURT ISSUES GUIDELINES ON APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED JUDGES TO ADJUDICATE LONG PENDING CASES IN HIGH COURTS
663 0 0
The #SupremeCourt has in a recent case of Lok Prahari through its General Secretary S.N. Shukla IAS (Retd.) vs Union of India and others has passed a Judgment dated 20-04-2021 and activated a dormant provision of #Article224A of the Constitution of India 1950 (#Constitution) for appointment of #adhocjudges to deal with the steep rise in backlog of…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:36pm
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF CHANGE OF SEAT OF ARBITRATION BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT
749 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hrishikesh Roy passed a Judgment dated 13-04-2021 in the case of M/S Inox Renewables Ltd. v. Jayesh Electricals Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 1556 Of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.29161 of 2019) and held that if the parties to #arbitration mutually…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:28pm
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT TWO INDIAN PARTIES CAN DESIGNATE A SEAT OF ARBITRATION OUTSIDE INDIA
575 0 0
It is common knowledge that the #seat of #arbitration determines the applicable law governing the arbitration including the procedural aspects. When parties specify a particular country as the seat of arbitration in an arbitration agreement, then, the applicable law of such country would govern the arbitration proceedings.To read more, please visit…
×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com