Upload Image
Trademarkclick .com

An application was filed by Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL) against Emami. It was for restraining Emami from telecasting one of its commercials for the product ‘Fair And Handsome’, which allegedly disparaged read more


kartik mago

Minerva Mills V. Union Of India (1980) Supreme Court had struck down Section 55 & 4 of the 42nd Amendment because it violated the basic structure doctrine. The Court emphasized on the importance read more


kartik mago

Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 talks about three types of instruments. These are promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques. 'Negotiable' means read more


kartik mago

Understanding ConfessionsA confession can be defined as any person admitting his guilt while being in custody. He states that he is guilty of the offence he is charged for. In the words of Justice Stephen, read more


kartik mago

A number of cases have been listed wherein the bank officials repeatedly call and harass the customers for payment of debt. They call through anonymous numbers and sometimes even abuse the bank customer, read more


NIPUN GAUTAM

Ø  Limitation is an important aspect for initiating proceedings under Section 138 or 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The legislature has made the timelines quite strict and Courts in India have read more


kartik mago

ASLAM BABALAL DESAI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1992)In general, grounds for bail cancellation are interference or attempt to interfere with the due course of administration of Justice, or evasion or attempt read more


Adv. Avani Bansal

यह वीडियो 'हमारा कानून' परियोजना का हिस्सा है, जो सरल भाषा में कुछ मुख्य कानूनों की व्याख्या करता है। इसका उद्देश्य लोगों के लिए कानूनों को सुलभ बनाना और कानूनी जागरूकता पैदा करना है। यह वीडियो भारत में read more


kartik mago

1.Smt. Asha Baldwa v. Ram GopalThis is one of the landmark judgments in Section 138. The petitioner had filed a petition under Section 482, CrPC to quash the proceedings instituted against him  for read more


kartik mago

Case Summary and OutcomeA bench of 9 judges of the Supreme Court of India held with majority ratio of 6:1 that the right to privacy was a constitutionally protected right in India, as well as somewhat read more


×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com