Lawstreet Journal

“Exclusivity can’t be granted on ‘Pe’ suffix”: Delhi HC refuses to grant interim relief to PhonePe in its plea against BharatPe [READ ORDER]

Lawstreet Journal 1 May 2021 7:58pm

Image courtesy: Lawstreet Journal Business “Exclusivity can’t be granted on ‘Pe’ suffix”: Delhi HC refuses to grant interim relief to PhonePe in its plea against BharatPe [READ ORDER]

The Delhi HC recently refused to grant interim injunction to PhonePe, in the latter’s plea seeking permanent injunction against BharatPe for allegedly using the same suffix “Pe.”

Justice C Hari Shankar dismissed the application, stated that PhonePe cannot claim authority and ownership solely over the “Pe” suffix, as no infringement can be claimed on the basis of part of a registered trademark.

Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta appeared on behalf of PhonePe private limited whereas Senior Advocate Gaurav Pachnanda appeared for the defendants.

Statement of PhonePe: 

PhonePe stated that their trademark and its variation was coined in 2015 and is being used by them since then. It was argued by them that “Pe” was an important part of their trademark, it was dominant and distinguished them. They further stated that they invented it.

Furthermore, it is stated that a rational consumer would notice the suffix “Pe.” They states that the defendant has copied their significant feature. It may lead into confusion amongst the consumers that the two are associated.

Statement of BharatPe:

The defendants argued that PhonePe was not registered proprietor or permitted user of the word “Pe” and stated that rights were acquired over “phonepe” and not the sole word “pe.”

The Court also noted that according to the legal position no exclusivity can be claimed over a descriptive mark, even by misspelling it.

The Court Prima Facie decides that PhonePe and BharatPe are both different and they cannot be separated and dissected into two words, such as “Phone” and “Pe.”




Continue Reading...

Tagged: Delhi High Court  
Disclaimer: SoOLEGAL in Media collaboration with Lawstreet Journal. SoOLEGAL take no responsbility for the content provided by Lawstreet Journal. For any discrepancies Contact Lawstreet Journal.
Did you find this write up useful? YES 0 NO 0
Edward Dillinger   4 May 2021 2:54am
Am short of words for the amazing profit you helped me earn in just a week with binary options strategy am so sorry I doubted at the beginning, I invested read more

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work









Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail