Team  SoOLEGAL

Delhi HC: Litigant owes a duty to be vigilant of his rights, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned

Team SoOLEGAL 27 Jun 2017 1:46pm

Delhi HC: Litigant owes a duty to be vigilant of his rights, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned

The High Court of Delhi earlier rapped an Appellant-company for their lack of vigilance in conducting a suit for recovery of money, and their subsequent conduct in blaming the Counsel for the delay in filing an Appeal.

The High Court was hearing an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking condonation of delay of 400 days in filing an appeal against an August, 2015 judgment passed by the Additional District Judge. 

“The litigant owes a duty to be vigilant of his rights and is also expected to be equally vigilant about the judicial proceedings p Tagged: High Court of Delhi   Litigant owes a duty to be vigilant  

Did you find this write up useful? YES 0 NO 0
Send
Featured Members view all

New Members view all

×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.