Advocate Sushila
SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT EXTENSION OF PERIOD UP TO WHICH DELAY CAN BE CONDONED IS NOT THE SAME AS EXTENSION OF LIMITATION PERIOD
Advocate Sushila Ram 28 Sep 2020

SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT EXTENSION OF PERIOD UP TO WHICH DELAY CAN BE CONDONED IS NOT THE SAME AS EXTENSION OF LIMITATION PERIOD

A Three Judge Bench of the #SupremeCourt comprising of the CJI SA Bobde and his companion Judges, Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian passed a Judgment dated September 18, 2020 in the case of Sagufa Ahmed & Ors. v. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal Nos. 30073008 of 2020 and held that any period beyond the #prescribedperiod, during which the Court or Tribunal has the discretion to allow a person to institute the proceedings, cannot be taken to be “prescribed period”.


To read more, please visit the link below:


http://www.theindianlawyer.in/blog/2020/09/27/supreme-court-has-held-that-extension-of-period-up-to-which-delay-can-be-condoned-is-not-the-same-as-extension-of-limitation-period/


#limitationperiod #extension #delay #condone #supremecourt

Did you find this write up useful? YES 0 NO 0
Featured Members view all

New Members view all

×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.