About 979 results

Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 15 Sep 2020

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> HOLDS THAT OWNERSHIP OF THE VEHICLE FROM WHICH DRUGS ARE RECOVERED IS IMMATERIAL UNDER THE NDPS Act
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, hereinafter referred to as the #NDPS Act, #prohibits a person from the production/manufacturing/cultivation, possession, sale, purchase, transport, storage, and/or consumption of any #narcoticdrug or #psychotropicsubstance.To read more, please visit the link below:http://www.theindianlawyer.in/blog/2020/09/13/supreme-Court-holds-that-ownership-of-the-vehicle-from-which-drugs-are-recovered-is-immaterial-under-the-ndps-act/#drugs…

Advocate Sushila

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> HOLDS THAT LEVY OF DUTY AGAINST ANTI-DUMPING IS ONLY FOR A LIMITED PERIOD OF TIME
A Three Judge Bench of the #supremeCourt comprising of Justices Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S. Ravindra Bhat passed a Judgment dated September 1, 2020 in the case of The Designated Authority & Ors. v. M/S The Andhra Petrochemicals Limited…

Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 29 Aug 2020

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> UPHOLDS THE VALIDITY OF THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION TO CONDUCT EXAMS IN 2020
The 3-Judge Bench of the #supremeCourt has in a recent case of Praneeth K and Others vs University Grants Commission and Others along with nine other Petitions,passed a Judgment dated 28-08-2020 and upheld the validity of the #Guidelines issued by…

Advocate Sushila

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> HOLDS SUIT TO START AFRESH ON THE RETURN OF A PLAINT
In a recent Judgment passed by the Special Bench of three Judges, the #supremeCourt of India decided upon whether a #Suit should start afresh in case of return of #Plaint. In the matter of M/S. Exl Careers and Another v.…

Advocate Sushila

Bihar Police has no territorial jurisdiction to investigate the case of Sushant Singh Rajput: Dr. Kislay Panday, solicitor <b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> of India
That #SushantSinghRajput’s #suicide was tragic and most unexpected is now behind us and what we now witnessing is a dogfight between #Bollywood which seems to have split down the middle.To read more, please visit the link below:http://www.theindianlawyer.in/blog/2020/08/01/bihar-police-has-no-territorial-jurisdiction-to-investigate-the-case-of-sushant-singh-rajput-dr-kislay-panday-solicitor-supreme-Court-of-india/#supremeCourt…

Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 17 Jul 2020

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> HELD THAT ROYAL FAMILY HAS CONTROL OVER KERALA PADMANABHA SWAMY TEMPLE
In a recent case of Sri Marthanda Varma (D) through L.R.s vs State of Kerala, a two-Judge Bench of the #supremeCourt has passed a Judgment dated 13-07-2020 and held that the #abolition of #privypurses and #derecognition of #Rulers of Indian…

Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 17 Jul 2020

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> CLARIFIES LAW ON ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
The #InformationTechnology Act, 2000 which deals with digital and electronic records and documents had brought in its wake amendments in the #EvidenceAct 1872 (‘the Act’) to enable legal recognition of such digital and electronic documents. To read more, please visit…

Shivangi
Shivangi Prasad 5 Jul 2020

Being Transgender- is it a mental disorder?
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) – WHO Version for 2016 (“ICD-10 Version: 2016”), under Chapter V ‘Mental and behavioural disorders (F00-F99)’ and ‘Disorders of adult personality and behaviour (F60-F69)’ laid down a category…

Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 13 Jun 2020

<b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b> LAYS DOWN PRINCIPLES FOR GRANTING COMPENSATION IN MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
The #supremeCourt has recently in the matters of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs Rajenderi Devi and Ors. dated 08-06-2020, Chandrakanta Tiwari Vs New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Anr. dated 08-06-2020, Sri Anthony Vs Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C dated 10-06-2020…

Advocate Sushila

FORCE MAJEURE CASES UNDER INDIAN LAW: CASE ANALYSIS 1:  <b>supreme</b> <b>Court</b>: SATYABRATA GHOSE VS MUGNEERAM BANGUR & CO., AND ANOTHER 1954 SCR 310
This Judgment is the first judgment that discusses force majeure and frustration of contracts. It has laid down that contracts can be deemed to be frustrated only and only when it strikes at the root of the contract or fundamentally…
Advanced Search
Title
Content
Tags
Date
Author
SAARTH A SoOLEGAL Technologies Initiative
×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com