C2RM… To Know More
Something Awesome Is In The Work
In the docuemnt as attached above the staute holding sheer primacy is the "Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985"
The contents are as follows:-
Application Under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Particulars of the Applicant
As given in the Memo of Partie
Particulars of the Respondents
As given in the Memo of Parties.
. Impugned Order:
That the applicant is aggrieved by the action, rather inaction of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the applicant even after _____ years of service which act on the part of the respondents is arbitrary, malafide, illegal, ultra vires of the Articles 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India and against the natural justice and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and this Hon'ble Tribunal.
That the applicant is also directing this application against non-payment of salary to the applicant equivalent to regular hands on the same and similar posts under the similar circumstances and with the same and the similar working conditions on the principles of Equal Pay for Equal Work as enunciated in the Constitution of India and upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and this Hon'ble Tribunal in the catena of cases.
That the applicant declares that the subject matter is within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Tribunal.
That the applicant further declares that the application is within the limitation.
Facts of the Case:
That the applicant submits that he was appointed as a part-time class IV employee in ______ . Ever since the applicant has been continued as such without regularizing his services despite repeated requests and representations made by the applicant to the respondents.
2 That such an action on the part of the respondents is unreasonable, unconscionable and unjust even when the applicant has been retained in the service as a part-time employee for such a long period.
That here it would be pertinent to mention that the applicant was registered with the Employment Exchange. The name of the applicant was struck out by the Employment Exchange as the applicant was in the part-time employment of the respondents
That the applicant has always been working and discharging his duties with great zeal and fervour and to the entire satisfaction of his superiors. The respondents have been extracting a full-time work from the applicant even though the applicant is only a part-time worker. The respondents are thus resorting to the unfair labour practice and if the applicant would resist to do so, he would be doing so at the cost of his job. The respondents have, as a matter of fact, used the applicant as a bonded labour by paying him petty salary and extracting the full time job, which an archaic practice being adopted by the respondents to this day in our 50th year of Independence is the most reprehensible and condemnable and needs to be stopped by directing the respondents to regularise the services of the applicant.
That there is no one in the government service from the family of the applicant. The applicant belongs to a very poor family and to the Schedule caste category
That the applicant has completed more than 240 days in every calender year right from very beginning of his service and he was in possession of requisite qualification at every stage. The applicant was well within the prescribed age limit at the time of his initial engagement in the respondent department.
That feeling aggrieved by such an arbitrary, malafide, discriminatory and illegal actions of the respondents, the applicant seeks the indulgence of this Hon'ble Tribunal on the following grounds amongst others, which may be taken at the time of arguments, each one of which is without prejudice to and independent of others :-
That the action, rather inaction of the respondents in not regularising the service of the applicant even after the applicant has served for such long period is arbitrary, malafide,
illegal, ultra vires, against the Articles 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India, dehors the rules and regulations and against the natural justice and the principles of law settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and this Hon'ble Tribunal
That reasons ascribed by the respondents for non-regularisation of the service of the applicant are unconscionable, unreasonable, unjustified and not sustainable in the eyes of law.
That the respondents are estopped due to their own act, deed and conduct from denying the benefit of regularisation to the applicant, more so when they have extended such benefits to other similarly situated persons by relaxation of rules. The principle of the Promissory Estopple applies against the respondents.
That the impugned action is against the well settled principles of the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Hon'ble Tribunal in catena of cases.
That the service of the applicant deserves to be regularised with effect from the date of his initial appointment and the applicant deserves to be paid arrears of salary on the principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work.
That it is settled law that the denial of regularisation and arrears of the salary is a recurring injury and recurring cause of action.
And with this the document sees its completion
In adherence to the rules and regulations of Bar Council of India, this website has been designed only for the purposes of circulation of information and not for the purpose of advertising.
Your use of SoOLEGAL service is completely at your own risk. Readers and Subscribers should seek proper advice from an expert before acting on the information mentioned herein. The content on this website is general information and none of the information contained on the website is in the nature of a legal opinion or otherwise amounts to any legal advice. User is requested to use his or her judgment and exchange of any such information shall be solely at the user’s risk.
SoOLEGAL does not take responsibility for actions of any member registered on the site and is not accountable for any decision taken by the reader on the basis of information/commitment provided by the registered member(s).By clicking on ‘ENTER’, the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
Resource centre is one stop destination for users who are seeking for latest updates and information related to the law. takes the privilege to bring every single legal resource to your knowledge in a hassle free way. Legal Content in resource centre to help you understand your case, legal requirements. More than 3000 Documents are available for Reading and Download which are listed in below categories:
SoOLEGAL Transaction Services Agreement :
S-1. Your Documents/ Advice Listings and Orders
S-1.4 Credit Card Fraud.
S-2. Transaction and Fulfilment, Refunds and Returns
S-2.1 Transaction and Fulfilment:
Fulfilment – Fulfilment is categorised under the following heads:
All taxes or surcharges imposed on fees payable by you to SoOLEGAL will be your responsibility.
S-6 Transactions Proceeds & Refunds.
S-7. Control of Site
S-8. Effect of Termination
"SoOLEGAL Refund Policies" means the return and refund policies published on the SoOLEGAL Site.
Category and Documents/ Advice Restrictions
Detail pages may not feature or contain Prohibited Content or .
Reviews, quotes or testimonials.
Solicitations for positive customer reviews.
Advertisements, promotional material, or watermarks on images, photos or videos.
Information which infringes any patent, trademark, copyright or other proprietary rights.
Information violating any law for the time being in force.
Do not include HTML, DHTML, Java, scripts or other types of executables in your detail pages.
Prohibited REGISTERED USER Activities and Actions
The use of e-mail intended to divert customers away from the SoOLEGAL.com Transactions process.
In your request, please provide an explanation of the legitimate business need for a second account.
Listing prohibited content may result in the cancellation of your listings, or the suspension or removal of your transacting privileges. REGISTERED USERS are responsible for ensuring that the Documents/ Advices they offer are legal and authorised for Transaction or re-Transaction.
If we determine that the content of a Documents/ Advice detail page or listing is prohibited, potentially illegal, or inappropriate, we may remove or alter it without prior notice. SoOLEGAL reserves the right to make judgments about whether or not content is appropriate.
Nudity: In general, images that portray nudity in a gratuitous or graphic manner are prohibited.
Intellectual Property Violations
Books - Unauthorised copies of books are prohibited.
Photos - Unauthorised copies of photos are prohibited.
YOU HAVE AGREED TO THIS TRANSACTION TERMS BY CLICKING THE AGREE BUTTON