NISHANT
cheque was not for valuable consideration debt has to be in existence as a crystallized demand and a demand contengent upon happening of an event
NISHANT MEHROTRA 22 Feb 2018

cheque was not for valuable consideration debt has to be in existence as a crystallized demand and a demand contengent upon happening of an event

Gujrat High Court :: Negotiable instruments act 1881   sec. 138  complainant / payee filling up signed blank cheque after 17 year - liability of drawer yet to be determined /civil suits by complainant pending - complainant filling up cheque on basis of report by chartered Accountant a mediator -Held :: cheque was not for valuable consideration debt has to be in existence as a crystallized demand and a demand contengent upon happening of an event.


Case:

Nikhil P Gandhi

            Vs.

State of Gujarat

Did you find this write up useful? YES 0 NO 0
User Comments
Send
Digital Payment Systemview all

Active Members

Have you activated yours ?

New Members view all
×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.